This page is not fully translated, yet. Please help completing the translation.
(remove this paragraph once the translation is finished)
edu-ID - Levels of Assurance
(back to Overview)
Table of Contents
Can the concept of attribute quality be adopted 1:1 from SWITCH? See Attribute Quality
Attribute
- Profile?
Identity Proof
- - Are LoAs needed that say something about this?
- See also Working group Identity Proof
Sandbox
References:
Identity verification etc. | RAF | eIDAS | DFN-AAI | edu-ID |
---|---|---|---|---|
RAF: 1. Identity proofing and credential issuance, 2. renewal and replacement eIDAS: 2.1.2, 2.2.2, 2.2.4 | /IAP/low | – | Basic (only 1.) | Placeholder 1 |
/IAP/medium | low | Advanced (only 1.) | Placeholder 2 | |
/IAP/high | substantial | – | Placeholder 3 | |
– | high | – | Placeholder 4 |
Important question: Can we assume that the quality of the identity determination is proportional to the quality of the attributes derived from the respective identity source? If yes, then so(?):
Attribute/identity sources | Proposal categorization | Comments |
---|---|---|
self-asserted | Placeholder 0 | – |
Challenge-Response | Placeholder 1 | Analog DFN-AAI Basic |
eID (eIDAS) - eID server (clients: ID card app, card reader, etc.) | Placeholder 2-4 | If eIDAS LoA is known(?) |
eID (eIDAS) - other module confirmations (e.g. Post Ident) | Placeholder 2 | LoA not known - eIDAS low must be accepted |
Home institution (DFN-AAI) | Placeholder 1-2 | DFN-AAI Basic or Advanced |
Other - ORCID | Placeholder 1 | API + User Login |
Other … (others to be expected) | depending on the method used for linking |